My morning blog travels turned up a real doozie that's emerging about the softwood lumber "deal" that was so miraculously negotiated.
Via Cathie From Canada, we learn that testimony given to Canada's Standing Committee on International Trade suggests that a "gift" of some $450 million dollars is to be handed over to the White House as part of the agreement.
I'd been wondering where that other $1 billion dollars was going - it appears that it's going to land in White House coffers where the Senate and House of Representatives won't be able to touch it. In terms of the US Federal Budget, $450 million is chicken feed - but in terms of Canada, it's not. We are essentially handing BushCo nearly half a billion dollars in an election year, in funds that can be used for whatever the White House deems fit - including, no doubt, bankrolling whatever they think they need to do to maintain the Rethuglican majority in the two houses.
We punted the Liberals out for misspending a mere $200 million in Canada. It appears that Harper's lot is about to waste nearly double that, and is doing so in his efforts to cuddle up with the Rethuglican cactus down there.
Mr. Harper, Canada is NOT the United States Republican party's whore, and Canadians should be outraged that you are making such deals.
A progressive voice shining light into the darkness of regressive politics. Pretty much anything will be fair game, and little will be held sacred.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About “Forced Treatment” and Homelessness
I need to comment on the political pressure to force people experiencing addiction into treatment. Superficially, it seems to address a prob...
-
On March 19, 2024 the United Conservative Party of Alberta held an event that they called " Let Kids Be Kids " (spoiler alert: i...
-
So, India is expanding its temper tantrum over Canada expressing concerns over the suspected role of the Modi government in the murder of ...
-
There is an entire class of argument that we see in discourse that basically relies on the idea that “physical attribute X means that Y can ...
No comments:
Post a Comment