While Harper is busy trying to pain the Liberals as "obstructing" the Air India investigation by voting down two unused clauses in the "anti-terrorism" laws passed in the wake of 9/11, his own government's actions are getting in the way by restricting the evidence that can be considered by the inquiry.
So...please tell me, just how is it that Harper can claim to be "tough on terrorism" when his own government's actions stand in way of the very investigation he claimed made those previously unused clauses necessary?
Never mind, in Harper's "oh-so open and honest" government, facts don't matter and are replaced by outright lies, and the politics of insinuation and guilt by association.
A progressive voice shining light into the darkness of regressive politics. Pretty much anything will be fair game, and little will be held sacred.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why Dems Can’t See Through Fascism
This morning, I awoke to hearing an interview of Senator John Fetterman on the radio. It was this interview: https://podcasts.apple.com/...
-
One of NARTH's favourite writers is a fellow by the name of Dr. Neil Whitehead. He has published a book entitled My Genes Made Me Do It...
-
Running around the internet, and speaking in various venues is a somewhat rare creature by the name of Walt Heyer who claims to be an ...
-
One of the most infuriating things I run across all too often are arguments from religious conservatives that try to bash transsexuals based...
No comments:
Post a Comment