Monday, January 21, 2008

Merger Or Takeover?

It's hard to say just what really was going on with this weekend's merging of Alberta Alliance and Wildrose Parties. Did the Alliance simply subsume Link Byfield's latest pet project? Or was the Alliance so troubled internally that the Wildrose Party's backers were able to grasp control of the larger entity and the money that it has?

There are, of course, other possible reasons for this weekend's marriage of far right wing and farther right wing parties. I've never been overly impressed with the Alberta Alliance - the party always struck me as little more than a provincial knock-off of the old Reform party. As for the Wildrose thing, there's no secret about what kind of "conservatism" the Byfield patriarchs represent, and it's a pretty hardline view on a lot of topics.

For quite some time, I've been hearing grumblings that the PC's aren't "conservative enough" from various corners, which no doubt fuels the spawning of parties like either the Alliance or Wildrose, but only seems to represent a fairly sparse minority of the province.
[Correction 21/1/08]:
The original version of this post incorrectly attributed a comment to Jane Greydanus from Daveberta's blog. I have removed the incorrect attribution, and extend my apologies to Ms. Greydanus.
[/Correction]
There's just enough to get a party started, but they seem to be of the ideological ilk that doesn't quite understand why their views aren't more broadly held by the electorate .

I do not begrudge the existence of these parties - it gives an ideological home to the far right, and lets the rest of us recognize the hardliners for what they are. But the history in Alberta (and much of Canada, really) is that such parties seldom last long enough to gain any real traction.

However, in Alberta today, you need to get a significant amount of traction with the voters in the urban areas - especially Calgary and Edmonton, but Red Deer, Lethbridge and Grande Prairie all have a fair bit of weight now. Both Calgary and Edmonton have experienced huge population growth in recent years (with Calgary cresting over 1 million residents - somewhere on order of a 10%-15% change since last election). No matter how you look at it, that has the potential to substantially change the character of the electorate.

Had the Ralph Klein resigned in the 1990s, and the Alberta Alliance visible at that time, they might have gained significant electoral traction. Alberta today is nowhere near the same province that it was back then. Today, they represent a tiny fraction of voters, and the Wildrose an even tinier fraction.

Ask yourself this - if the Alberta Alliance was the natural home for "conservative" voters disaffected with the PC's, why did Link Byfield go starting the Wildrose Party a year or so back? He couldn't find a home in the Alberta Alliance? It had already drifted too far left for him?

I suspect that this "merged party" will quietly fade into the political background in Alberta after an election expected this spring.

5 comments:

Jane Morgan said...

Hello,

I see that you have attributed a quote to me that was actually made by daveberta.

I trust you will post a clarification.

Regards,
Jane (Greydanus) Morgan

Niles said...

Does this give Byfield free press time? Or even monies out of the taxbase? That's pretty much the gold ring isn't it?

I'm surprised they didn't just name it the Alberta party. Worked so well next door, there must be a future in it.

But then, that might not go over well when they merge with the Western secessionist party...or at least one of the Western secessionist parties. Those groups all seem to want to become part of the US, as if the US would give them standing higher than Costa Rica.

MgS said...

Firstlady:

Fair point - my error. I have updated the post according, and extend my apologies.

Anonymous said...

"Ask yourself this - if the Alberta Alliance was the natural home for "conservative" voters disaffected with the PC's, why did Link Byfield go starting the Wildrose Party a year or so back? He couldn't find a home in the Alberta Alliance? It had already drifted too far left for him?"

Is it possible that the founders of the party realized that Alberta needs a center right which the Alliance wasn't and the PC's haven't been for some time. If you are looking for proof of this just look at who was voted party president.

MgS said...

It's hard for me to call Byfield "center right". His advocacy has always been much farther to the right than "center" in my view. (By comparison, he makes the Klein-era PC's look positively centrist)

Collective Punishment

Ever since Pierre Poilievre opened his mouth and declared that Trans Women need to be banned from washrooms and locker rooms , there's b...