We get to see up close and personal the kind of thinking that Minister Liepert thinks is a perfectly good excuse for axing programs.
His response to very direct questions from opposition MLA's Kent Hehr, Lori Blakeman and Rachel Notley with regards to cutting Gender Reassignment Surgery funding from the Alberta Health Care Insurance Plan boils down to "well, we cut other things too".
Streaming Video Feed
Of Note:
Kent Hehr @ 11:15 has a great statement on the GRS topic
Lori Blakeman @ 25:00 takes Minister Liepert to task
Rachel Notley @ 51:00 similarly takes on Minister Liepert.
Why yes, yes they did. What else did they decide to cut? Well, let's start with the $200 subsidy for chiropractic care - this primarily affects seniors who are on limited, fixed incomes. Then he announced that they defunded a youth suicide prevention program. Brilliant - it's not like youth have any real political voice to begin with, and goodness knows Mr. Liepert couldn't give a fig if a few more troubled teens attempt to take their lives. After all, a dead teen doesn't cost the health care system any money, do they? Do I really need to point out how common suicide attempts are among transgender youth?
While I am sure that some of the programs that Liepert axed aren't medically necessary by any measure, I do know that GRS is deemed medically necessary for severe cases of Gender Identity Disorder. That is one of the key distinctions between it and some of the other cuts that Liepert has referred to.
When I look at a health care system whose overseers - the "superboard" - can afford to vote themselves a 25% pay hike in the midst of a recession, I can only say that Minister Liepert is looking in the wrong places for "efficiencies". He could save far more than $700,000 I'm sure - and I'm not even going to guess how much it will cost the government to defend its decision against the inevitable challenges to their delisting of GRS.
Liepert thinks that GRS is "healthcare of the 50s" - which only goes to show his gross ignorance of the history of treatment for transsexuals. If he wants to build a health care system for the 21st century, it's time that he realized that includes all Albertans, not just those that Mr. Liepert approves of.
Alberta's government has lost sight of its basic humanity.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Alberta's Anti-Trans Legislation
So, now that the UCP has rolled out their anti-trans legislation, we can take a long look at it. Yesterday, they tabled 3 related bills and...
-
On March 19, 2024 the United Conservative Party of Alberta held an event that they called " Let Kids Be Kids " (spoiler alert: i...
-
There is an entire class of argument that we see in discourse that basically relies on the idea that “physical attribute X means that Y can ... -
So, India is expanding its temper tantrum over Canada expressing concerns over the suspected role of the Modi government in the murder of ...
3 comments:
How much will it cost in court to defend their decision? They probably don't care. They would fight it on "principle".
I remember when MLA Stockwell Day was sued for libelling someone. The government paid his defence costs. The person was asking for only $50k but the government spent well over half a million dollars to defend Day.
It's not about the money, it's about the "principle" of never having to say they were wrong.
"Alberta's government has lost sight of its basic humanity."You just noticed that now? It's been gone at least since Ralph Klein was elected, if not earlier.
I won't say that I liked Ralph either, but after seeing Liepert's performance in the Legislature, I think they've sunk to new lows.
GRS funding survived even the harshest cuts of the Klein years.
They think it's a 'lifestyle' choice, done for kinky liberal elite fun. Of course they defunded it. It's not like it's touted as surgical reconstruction for grossly aberrant physiology.
The entire shortfall 'panic' is a use of that shock doctrine stuff to start chopping away at healthcare so they can start moaning how private for profit healthcare would be ever so much better than public funding.
And they'll get elected *again*, so they're obviously right in what they do...right?
Post a Comment