Watching the US establish a case for invading Iran is fascinating, rather - kind of like watching a child playing "tetris" with Lego bricks.
Today, what comes bubbling to the surface, but the allegation that Iran's newly elected President is one of the 1979 Hostage Takers.
Right now, the Americans are being coy about how they will respond, saying only that "an investigation is in progress". However, if assertions used to justify invading Iraq are valid, then it seems to me quite reasonable that we will soon see Rumsfeld, or Rice standing up and accusing Iran's president of not only aiding and abetting terrorists, but of in fact having been one himself.
A progressive voice shining light into the darkness of regressive politics. Pretty much anything will be fair game, and little will be held sacred.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Dear Skeptic Mag: Kindly Fuck Right Off
So, over at Skeptic, we find an article criticizing "experts" (read academics, researchers, etc) for being "too political...
-
Running around the internet, and speaking in various venues is a somewhat rare creature by the name of Walt Heyer who claims to be an ...
-
One of the favourite - and utterly brain dead - criticisms of evolution that is often raised is the "sheer improbability" of the w...
-
The resurrection of Ted Morton's obnoxious Bill 208 has, of course, brought forth a series of right-wing talking points about how ...
No comments:
Post a Comment