Harper thinks he's playing smart with our economy ... or perhaps I should say puppetmaster Flanagan does.
However, I can think of one program that's amazingly slashable - it's called the War in Afghanistan that Harper is so high on.  It's costing Canadian taxpayers billions of dollars - and if we are heading into an economic slowdown, I can think of a lot of places to spend that money other than prosecuting a questionable occupation of a foreign power.  
H/T:  Commenter Stephanie (via e-mail)
A progressive voice shining light into the darkness of regressive politics. Pretty much anything will be fair game, and little will be held sacred.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Alberta Bill 2 and The Notwithstanding Clause
So, Alberta has used S33 as part of its “Back To Work” legislation for ending the teachers strike. There will be many pixels of virtual ink ...
- 
Running around the internet, and speaking in various venues is a somewhat rare creature by the name of Walt Heyer who claims to be an ...
- 
One of the favourite - and utterly brain dead - criticisms of evolution that is often raised is the "sheer improbability" of the w...
- 
The resurrection of Ted Morton's obnoxious Bill 208 has, of course, brought forth a series of right-wing talking points about how ...
 
2 comments:
My only problem with pulling out of Afghanistan is that we already know what a Taliban government looks like. The main losers are women and children.
Veronique,
I agree with you on that front, however, we also have to recognize that an occupation that is perceived by the people of a region as hostile or punitive is unlikely to succeed either in stabilizing the region or bringing about the kind of cultural change that you and I might desire.
Besides, I don't think Canadians have either the resources or desire to be involved in occupying Afghanistan for multiple generations. (a la what the British Empire did in India - and even there the degree of "success" in meeting the British Empire's goals is certainly open to debate - the only 'takeaway' is that the British left the infrastructure for a civil government behind - both culturally and logistically)
Post a Comment