There’s been a lot of discussion back and forth about the explosion at Al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza. Hamas claims it was an Israeli bomb or missile attack, Israel claims it’s the result of a failed rocket launched from within Gaza.
I have thoughts about this. Certainly, I agree that the site does not look like a typical high explosive device went off. That is a point that leans away from the standard bombs that Israel has been using.
The Israeli claim is that the rocket failed, sprayed fuel around which subsequently caught fire after something at or near ground level exploded. The part about this that doesn’t add up entirely for me with this is twofold:
1). The alleged rocket appears to have failed at a fairly high altitude, and if it exploded, there should be evidence of both fuel and rocket debris in the vicinity. That hasn’t been identified yet.
2). IF the rocket’s fuel canisters had managed to fall to the ground, and exploded there, that might explain the smaller crater at the site, but where’s the bits of the canister?
3). The cars - the cars really bother me here. The pictures I’ve seen show cars that clearly were subjected to intense heat - not the kind of heat that you see when a car catches fire and causes the one adjacent to burn as well. Assuming that the Gaza rockets use something like Hydrogen Peroxide as a fuel (it’s relatively easily made, and burns plenty hot), I’m not sure that a fuel load would result in a strong enough fire to do what has been observed.
*For clarity - I am not an explosives or rocket expert, so I will concede that it seems possible that it could have been a failed rocket.
My concern with the failed rocket scenario is it seems just a little too pat, and too specific. It’s the kind of specificity that I would expect with an actual forensic report of the site itself, and yet Israel trotted it out within hours.
It also seems that the world is ignoring another line of explanation: The use of a Thermobaric Weapon. Those devices are designed to produce exactly the kind of effect that we see at the hospital, and they’re intended to explode above ground level as a rule. According to Wikipedia (perhaps not the most reliable source), Israel is rumoured to have had these weapons since about 1990, and they could easily have bought them from the US as well.
Dropping a moderate sized thermobaric weapon in the courtyard of the hospital would produce a considerable amount of damage, and more specifically could explain the damage to the cars, which were clearly subjected to an intense blast of fire. Further, thermobaric munitions can be delivered in a variety of ways, ranging from aircraft to traditional ground based artillery.
Even here, we need to go through the site and find any pieces of whatever container held the explosive. That requires a far more detailed forensic analysis than is likely possible in the heat of active warfare, but it seems necessary. Both parties in this conflict have too many reasons to assign blame to the other side to be credible.
[Update Oct 22, 2023]: Independent reviews by people with more knowledge than I do are lining up on the “errant rocket” hypothesis. Although I remain somewhat skeptical of that explanation, I have no compelling evidence to the contrary.
No comments:
Post a Comment