Remember Mr. Abdelrazik?:
Under a UN Security Council resolution, Ottawa has the power to punish anyone who provides Abdelrazik with material support.
Even if he got a paycheque, he couldn't withdraw funds from his bank account. After a court battle, he won an injunction that allowed him limited monthly withdrawals from his credit union account.
Both CSIS and the RCMP have acknowledged they have no evidence against Abdelrazik. He was exonerated of any ties to al-Qaida by the Sudanese Justice Department in 2005.
But efforts to have his name removed from the list have been unsuccessful. The federal government and other authorities have continued to apply the sanctions.
Does anybody else see something horribly wrong here? We have a man whose life is being constrained not because of a crime he committed, but because his name got on some arbitrary list somewhere and the agencies of government involved have refused to remove his name from it - in spite of having absolutely no evidence to support the allegations that got his name on the list in the first place!
Someone please explain to me how this is even remotely related to the concept of justice - much less the more ill-defined terms of "security" in the post-9/11 world, where our government seems to have decided that "security" means invading people's lives without cause and casting suspicion upon all in the name of extending the government's invasion into our lives.
North America is starting to sound a lot like the stories we used to hear coming out of the old Warsaw Pact countries.