tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7207011.post7452828423470961479..comments2024-02-23T15:48:24.856-07:00Comments on The Cracked Crystal Ball II: Theocracy: Bloedow Tries To Mangle The WordUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7207011.post-55203301386450242652010-05-25T16:06:06.668-07:002010-05-25T16:06:06.668-07:00Ah - attack the person rather than the argument. ...Ah - attack the person rather than the argument. Good debating form, there Tim.MgShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11183962674882855323noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7207011.post-67350539881357392302010-05-25T08:07:22.207-07:002010-05-25T08:07:22.207-07:00Look, this is the last time here I'll waste my...Look, this is the last time here I'll waste my time responding to the subinfantile dishonesty of an intellectual boor as yourself, if you're not going to elevate the discussion. First you said I make sexuality the crux of my article, now you're simply saying that I raised the issue. If you possess even the smallest degree of rationality, you know there is a hug difference between crux and simply raising an issue. But you're changing the argument on the run because you're a liar, and thoroughly dishonest or because you know nothing about rationality. Pcik on someone your own size - find a sparring partner who's two years old. Quit making a fool of yourself by publishing such stupidity on the internet for everyone to see.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7207011.post-7926428850452904502010-05-25T07:39:44.225-07:002010-05-25T07:39:44.225-07:00Funny, it was your article that raised the issues ...Funny, it was your article that raised the issues of sexuality in the first place - in the context of creating biblically-based laws of proscription no less ... or do you deny that?<br /><br />Did you hit a nerve? Not really, just proved once again that your notion of 'freedom of religion' is really all about imposing your religiously inspired beliefs on everyone around you. Regardless of whether they subscribe to your faith or not.<br /><br />In short, you would limit others ability to contribute to society based not on their beliefs, but on YOUR beliefs, whether or not they are shared.MgShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11183962674882855323noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7207011.post-42548142541450709092010-05-24T22:36:55.894-07:002010-05-24T22:36:55.894-07:00I thought only barbarians worshiped sex as their g...I thought only barbarians worshiped sex as their god. You write: "Now we come to the crux of Mr. Bloedow's position - and it's the very area that I would have suspected from the start." Sounds like I touched a nerve. The Bible exposed the nature of your uncivilized god. And instead of dealing with your guilty conscience, you chose to use gross dishonesty and claim that this point was the crux of my position. Do tell what exactly in the text of what I wrote indicates that this was the crux of my position? Nope, it exposes the crux of your uncivilized worship of sex, your uncontrolled passions and anti-adult aspirations. Civilization was never built on people like you. If you can't show intelligence, at least show some integrity by not lying about me. What a pathetic joke...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com