tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7207011.post113106321796805316..comments2024-02-23T15:48:24.856-07:00Comments on The Cracked Crystal Ball II: Alberta's PuritansUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7207011.post-1131227941910301302005-11-05T14:59:00.000-07:002005-11-05T14:59:00.000-07:00But there is one VERY signifiant thing that you ar...But there is one VERY signifiant thing that you are missing.<BR/><BR/>By granting rights to the unborn in regards to suing the mother, it opens up a whole can of worms. What if the mother has a drink when pregnent? Or does drugs? Or fails to drink four glasses of milk each day? Or doesn't get adequeate rest? Can the child sue the parent for not providing the **best** while they were in the womb? e.g. blaming future failure - intelligence, physical strength/capabilities, appearance, etc... on the mother?<BR/><BR/>There is a lot of liability here that is opened up - and we should ask ourselves, if as a society we really want to go there?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7207011.post-1131064235563873362005-11-03T17:30:00.000-07:002005-11-03T17:30:00.000-07:00The other problem with this law is that it's desig...The other problem with this law is that it's designed to abbrogate society's responsibilty for the disabled. The point of the legislation is so that the private insurance companies are sued for the injuries and reslutant care and that the health care system doesn't have to deal with it.<BR/><BR/>It's just another way to privatize health care, on top of all the other arguments presented here.<BR/><BR/>JN<BR/><A HREF="http://www.nishiyama.tzo.com/jweb/blog" REL="nofollow">www.nishiyama.tzo.com</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com